Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Jancis Fuller v. Scott Harris, et al
as 17-5186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jancis Fuller
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott S. Harris, Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court and Clayton R. Higgins, Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court
Antoine Degrate v. Scott Harri
as 17-5187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoine D. Degrate
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott S. Harris, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States, Office of the Clerk
SCOTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01690
Petitioner:
DWAYNE E. SCOTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and J. BALTAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Marlon Watford v. Erik Fossum, et al
as 17-5168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marlon L. Watford
Defendant - Appellee:
Erik Fossum and Scott S. Harris
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv01552
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Webb-el v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 17-5159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith B. Webb-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas R. Kane, Director, U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, Commissioner, U.S. Parole Commission, A. Smith, A-2 Unit Counselor, Federal Correctional Institution and others
WEBB-EL
as 1:2017cv01111
Plaintiff:
KEITH BRYANT WEBB-EL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT, A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv01112
Plaintiff:
WALTER BERNARD MORTON, JR.
Defendant:
J. PATRICIA WILSON-SMOOT, MARK TANNER, SCOTT KUDIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREAZIL v. TRAVERS et al
as 1:2017cv00925
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BREAZIL
Defendant:
JACOB C. TRAVERS, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
WATFORD v. FOSSUM et al
as 1:2017cv00897
Plaintiff:
MARLON L. WATFORD
Defendant:
ERIK FOSSUM and SCOTT S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
