Cases 41 - 50 of 6,914
BRAXTON v. AKINTOYE
as 1:2023cv03020
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
HANNAH AKINTOYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LETTIERI v. FEDERAL MARSHALS et al
as 1:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
FEDERAL MARSHALS and NIAGARA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAXTON v. PIPE
as 1:2023cv03023
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
JUDITH PIPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUFFIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03321
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD E. DUFFIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LOUISE WOOD FLANAGAN, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDDIE ANDERSON, EMERY MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03122
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv03223
Plaintiff:
JENNY SMITH and JERRY SMITH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE LYNN FLEMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FCI DANBURY and BALTIMORE RRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOQADDEM v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
MAHA MOQADDEM
Respondent:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT and SUPERIOR STATE COURT OF CALIFORNIA AIRPORT COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, CENTURY REGIONAL DET FACILITY, ANGELA D. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
