Cases 61 - 70 of 156
Derrick Brown v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
as 14-5033
Petitioner - Appellant:
Derrick L. Brown
Respondent - Appellee:
United States Attorney and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
BROWN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv00023
Petitioner:
DERRICK L. BROWN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Ladeairous v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-5007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Michael Ladeairous
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General and Michael J. Horowitz, United States Inspector General
MILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01922
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MILLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACKLES v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2013cv01907
Plaintiff:
MONEEK M. ACKLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, JOHN BOEHNER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LADEAIROUS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01588
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MICHAEL HOROWITZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5257
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROBINSON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01198
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MARK P. LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOLASPRASHAD v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01197
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., SECRETARY OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and WALTER M. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01193
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOHN CLARK and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
