Cases 61 - 70 of 203
BENOIT v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
AUNDEL BENOIT
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, KATHLEEN KENNEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTANEDA v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00307
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ROY CASTANEDA
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, JOSE SANTANA, J.A. TERRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. James Mattis
as 18-5032
Petitioner - Appellee:
John Doe
Respondent - Appellant:
James Mattis, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense
BRYANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, SARAH R. BUC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EJONGA et al v. ROSENSTEIN et al
as 1:2017cv02813
Plaintiff:
JOJO DEOGRACIAS EJONGA, DEANTHONY FRANKS and LEE PATRICK-JOHNSON
Defendant:
ROD ROSENSTEIN, ROBERT MUELLER, ANDREW MCCABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2017cv02603
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONILLA v. CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICES ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2017cv02483
Plaintiff:
STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAIG v. PEOPLE OF THE CITY, COUNTY OF DENVER et al
as 1:2017cv02414
Plaintiff:
BOBBY WOOD CRAIG
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE CITY, COUNTY OF DENVER, LOMBARDI, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, M. ROBINOWITZ, J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Bryant v. DC, et al
as 17-7119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronnie L. Bryant
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, John Doe, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
