Cases 61 - 70 of 140
JONES v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv00204
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JONES
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAGBY v. THALER et al
as 1:2012cv01521
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY
Defendant:
RICK THALER, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, RUPERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. KIRCHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
STEVE KIRCHNER, JOSEPH SOPATA, STEPHEN NAUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Jones v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Prisons, Russell Perdue, Warden, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Reome, Mr., Property Officer, Federal Bureau Of Prisons
JONES v. WAINWRIGHT
as 1:2011cv02205
Petitioner:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Respondent:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles Jones, Jr. v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 11-5340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Isaac Fulwood, Jr., United States Parole Commission, Gary Wheeler, (AUSA) US Attorney (Assistant) and others
TAYLOR v. FULWOOD
as 1:2011cv01911
Plaintiff:
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, L. JENKINS, PAUL HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES, JR. v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, US PAROLE COMMISSION, GARY WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. WAINWRIGHT
as 1:2011cv01431
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS JONES, JR.
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES, JR. v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01340
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. JONES, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, PERDUE and REOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
