Cases 61 - 70 of 78
BARNETT v. AUGUSTINE et al
as 1:2010cv00788
Plaintiff:
LEWIS CARL BARNETT
Defendant:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, JEFF CARSON, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis Clay v. DOJ, et al
as 10-5058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lewis Nathaniel Clay
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and Executive Office For United States Attorneys
Anthony Lewis v. USA
as 10-5028
Petitioner - Appellant:
Anthony Lewis
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
BAILEY v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01439
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, RAYMOND E. HOLT, D.B. DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Lewis v. DOJ
as 09-5225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION & PRIVACY ACT UNIT
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01056
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00770
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LEWIS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATE ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2009cv00746
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
LEWIS v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2009cv00264
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
