Cases 71 - 80 of 276
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEELER v. HARRIS
as 1:2015cv01512
Plaintiff:
LEROY K. WHEELER
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. HYLTON et al
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
HYLTON, D. LAWHORNE, STERNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. LAWHORNE, STERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Wilson v. Thomas Engle, et al
as 14-7200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bryan K. Wilson
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas D. Engle and Burka and Engle, PLLC
WATTLETON v. DAVIS
as 1:2014cv02017
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
BRIAN K. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. ENGLE et al
as 1:2014cv01964
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K. WILSON
Defendant:
THOMAS D. ENGLE and BURKA AND ENGLE, P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Miller v. Scott Harris, et al
as 14-5222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas W. Miller
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott S. Harris, Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court, Official and Individual Capcity for acts committed outside of their scope and ministerial capacities, Redmond K. Barnes, Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court, Official and Individual Capcity for acts committed outside of their scope and ministerial capacities and Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General
HILDERBRAND v. SUTER et al
as 1:2014cv01449
Plaintiff:
MARK ANDREW HILDERBRAND
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, SCOTT S. HARRIS and CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
