Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 71 - 80 of 124
NELSON v. USA
as 1:2012cv01455
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: GREGORY SCOTT NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BRIGDEN v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2012cv00753
Petitioner: SCOTT DAVID BRIGDEN
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00480
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
PARKS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00205
Petitioner: DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Respondent: ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROUDABUSH v. HIGGS et al
as 1:2011cv02232
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: JOSEPH HIGGS, PHIL GRINES, SCOTT BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCINTYRE v. FULWOOD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01520
Plaintiff: DARREN MCINTYRE
Defendant: ISAAC FULWOOD, SCOTT KUBIC, JOSEPH PACHOLSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HALL v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2011cv01134
Plaintiff: TONITA HALL
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, SCOTT BALLARD, SAMUEL OLENI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE v. LAPPIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00717
Plaintiff: STEPHEN G. BURKE
Defendant: HARLEY LAPPIN, JOYCE CONLEY, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00275
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MIDDLEBROOKS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01945
Petitioner: GEORGE LEON ADAMS
Respondent: SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?