Cases 81 - 90 of 326
GEORGE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv02128
Plaintiff:
MARK D. GEORGE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RODGERS and PETER NEWSHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNAIR v. WARDEN OF DC JAIL et al
as 1:2017cv01943
Petitioner:
JIMMIE MCNAIR
Respondent:
WARDEN OF DC JAIL, LINARD JOHNSON and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Stephen Leonard v. George Washington University, et al
as 17-5194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen Daniel Leonard
Defendant - Appellee:
George Washington University Hospital, Georgetown University Hospital, Georgetown University and others
Ronnie Bryant v. DC, et al
as 17-7119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronnie L. Bryant
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, John Doe, Lieutenant and others
MILLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
JULIUS WAYNE MILLER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01289
Plaintiff:
RONNIE L. BRYANT
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CYMES v. USDC CLERK, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv00953
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS J. CYMES
Respondent:
USDC CLERK, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLETCHER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE
as 1:2017cv00705
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS FLETCHER
Respondent:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. D.C. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv00669
Plaintiff:
DARRON K. LEE
Defendant:
D.C. PAROLE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
