Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
KHAN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01650
Petitioner: MAJID S. KHAN
Respondent: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and LANCE A. OKAMURA
Amicus Curiae: SEPTEMBER 11TH FAMILIES FOR PEACEFUL TOMORROWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KHAN v. USA
as 1:2014cv01428
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: KERRY F. KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HAMIDULLAH et al v. OBAMA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00758
Petitioner: HAMIDULLAH and WAKEEL KHAN
Respondent: BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT M. GATES, JACK L. BRIGGS, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KHAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Petitioner: JAN SHER KHAN and SHAH NAWAZ KHAN
Respondent: BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT GATES and JOHN DOES NOS. 1 THROUGH 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KHAN v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01101
Petitioner: SHAWALI KHAN
Respondent: GEORGE W. BUSH, ROBERT M. GATES, DAVID M. THOMAS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MOHAMMED et al v. RUMSFELD Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv01680
Petitioner: GHULAM MOHAMMED, RAZ MOHAMMAD, HASAN BALGAID and others
Respondent: DONALD RUMSFELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JABBAROV et al vs. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2005cv02386
Plaintiff: OMAR (LNU), SHARAF AL SANANI, FAHD AL HARAAZI and others
Petitioner: ABDULLAH LNU, NADIR OMAR ADULLAH BIN SAADOUN ALSAARY, AMER MOHAMMON and others
Respondent: MIKE BUMGARNER, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae: MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?