Cases 1 - 10 of 23
HALL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv03605
Plaintiff:
CARLESE J. HALL
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, ARCOLA WASHINGTON-ADDUCI, PATRICIA V. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. BRADLEY
as 1:2020cv02478
Defendant:
DAVID J. BRADLEY
Plaintiff:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
ALLAH BURMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORMAN WEIDLICH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BENOIT v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
AUNDEL BENOIT
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, KATHLEEN KENNEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, M. ROBINOWITZ, J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPMAN v. HEATH et al
as 1:2017cv01735
Plaintiff:
LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CHAPMAN, III
Defendant:
L.R. HEATH, BARRY SIERRO, E. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2017cv01567
Plaintiff:
JEROME A. BRADLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DIAL v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
SHOUNDELLE DONTIA DIAL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, BRADLEY T. GROSS, ANGELA P. DUNBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean-Gabriel Bernier v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jean-Gabriel Bernier
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
