Cases 1 - 8 of 8
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Hylton, et al
as 16-5062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Hylton, CDUSM, Proctor, Deputy U.S. Marshal, Anderson, D/S and others
ROUDABUSH v. CORRECTIONAL OFC. PIRELLI et al
as 1:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFC. PIRELLI, CORRECTIONAL OFC. CUCCINI, UNKNOWN (TO BE NAMED) CORRECTIONAL OFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOY v. CASTILLO et al
as 1:2012cv00505
Plaintiff:
JOAQUIN IRWIN FOY
Defendant:
JUAN CASTILLO, PSYCHE STAFF OF CERTAIN DOCTORS, CERTAIN CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS OF MENTAL HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUANDER v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS et al
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL QUANDER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, ANSEL, MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Harrison v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 08-5463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Henry Harrison
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley G. Lappin, Harrell Watts, K. M. White and others
RILEY v. MAYOR et al
as 1:2008cv00450
Plaintiff:
WAYNE ANTHONY RILEY
Defendant:
MAYOR, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali, Abdus-Shahid MS v. DC, et al
as 00-5282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Virginia, Department of Corrections, State of Virginia and others
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Robert N. Weiner
Smith, Alvin Darrell v. DC, et al
as 97-7232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Kiddwell, Security, Transportation, Occoquan Facility, Lorton, District of Columbia Department of Corrections and others
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Caroline M. Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
