Cases 1 - 10 of 77
MCKELLOP v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
JEFFREY A. MCKELLOP
Respondent:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. DC ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
KEITH DIMITRI JOHNSON
Defendant:
DC ATTORNEY GENERAL and DC MAYOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. CTF
as 1:2022cv03865
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER
Defendant:
CTF, DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HEALTH SERVICES CTF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Bowser, Jr. v. DC Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-7071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark K. Bowser, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DC Department of Corrections, My Own Meals Inc, Company 1, Spring Valley, Company 2 and others
LEWIS v. MAYOR(S) OF WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant:
MAYOR(S) OF WASHINGTON, DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONROE-RICKS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR D.C. et al
as 1:2021cv03061
Petitioner:
VICKY MONROE-RICKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR D.C. and DC SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PHILLIPS v. DC JAIL
as 1:2021cv03090
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DC JAIL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAXTON v. HAIRSTON et al
as 1:2021cv03020
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
RUSSELL HAIRSTON, KRISTIN MCGOUGH, DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. COLBERT et al
as 1:2021cv00479
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAMED FOOD SERVICE STAFF MEMBER 3, UNKNOWN NAMED MEDICAL STAFF MEMBER 2, RIVERA and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. KASUL et al
as 1:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
J. MILLER EVANS
Defendant:
BRYAN KASUL, WASHINGTON DC USA and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
