Cases 1 - 10 of 14
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Dynan, et al
as 16-5290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Dynan, Assistant Warden, J. Hollingsworth, Warden, C. E. Samuels, Director, F-BOP and others
PEARSON v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2016cv00879
Petitioner:
PRESTON PEARSON
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Mason, et al
as 16-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ms. Mason, A. Warden, Robinson, Unit Mgr., Wright, Case Mgr. and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-5114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., J. Hollingsworth, Bittner, LT. and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Dynan, et al
as 16-5092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Dynan, Assistant Warden, J. Hollingsworth, Warden, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, F-BOP and others
ROUDABUSH v. DYNAN et al
as 1:2015cv01682
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C. DYNAN, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C. E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01360
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., J. HOLLINGSWORTH, REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. HALL et al
as 1:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
E. HALL, MARCHANELLO, BITENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01197
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., J. HOLLINGSWORTH, BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MASON et al
as 1:2015cv01196
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
MASON, ROBINSON, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
