Cases 1 - 10 of 20
John Hughes, III v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-5115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Hughes, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission and Michael Carvajal, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
HUGHES v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUGHES, III
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and MICHAEL CARVJAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEON CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY, HUGH HARVEY, JR., JODY S. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENT v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02189
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, FRANK LARA, BUNKER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CROCKETT v. HURWITZ
as 1:2019cv02192
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DALE CROCKETT
Defendant:
HUGH HURWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02013
Defendant:
JEFFREY ROSEN, HUGH J. HURWITZ, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SMITH v. HURWITZ
as 1:2019cv00548
Defendant:
HUGH J. HURWITZ
Plaintiff:
GARY LEE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. BOLSTER et al
as 1:2018cv00357
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUGHES, III
Defendant:
MARK BOLSTER, J. RAY ORMOND and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AKASSY v. OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE DEFENDER et al
as 1:2017cv00668
Plaintiff:
HUGHES-DENVER AKASSY
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE DEFENDER, RICHARD M. GREENBERG, RISA GERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLEMING v. MEDICARE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION GROUP et al
as 1:2015cv01135
Plaintiff:
RHONDA FLEMING
Defendant:
MEDICARE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION GROUP , HUGH GILMORE , VENDETTA DUTTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
