Cases 1 - 10 of 89
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelvin Miles v. William Barr, et al
as 22-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant / Appellee:
William Barr, John D. Ashcroft, Alberto R. Gonzales and others
MILES v. BARR et al
as 1:2021cv02271
Not Classified By Court:
KELVIN J. MILES, WILLIAM BARR, JOHN ASHCROFT and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN MILES
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PARKS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
CARLOS PARKS
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH and ERIC H. HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILES v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, LORETTA LYNCH, ERIC H. HOLDER and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN J. MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv01793
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., WILLIAM P. BARR, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR B. PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLERVRAIN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2019cv00890
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JEFF SESSIONS and LORETTA LYNCH
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
VICTOR B. PERKINS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LORETTA LYNCH and JOHN ASHCROFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Vandivere, et al v. Loretta E. Lynch, et al
as 17-5211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Dow Vandivere and Jon Karl Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Thomas R. Kane, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Victor Perkins v. John Ashcroft, et al
as 17-5166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Bernard Perkins
Defendant - Appellee:
John D. Ashcroft, Alberto R. Gonzales, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
