Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BENOIT v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
AUNDEL BENOIT
Defendant:
RICHARD KANE, KATHLEEN KENNEY, J.L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Dynan, et al
as 16-5290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Dynan, Assistant Warden, J. Hollingsworth, Warden, C. E. Samuels, Director, F-BOP and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Dynan, et al
as 16-5092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Dynan, Assistant Warden, J. Hollingsworth, Warden, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, F-BOP and others
CAMPBELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01784
Plaintiff:
GERALD LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOUGHTY, F. OLMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01671
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. DYNAN et al
as 1:2015cv01682
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C. DYNAN, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C. E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv02175
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ-CONTRERAS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01950
Plaintiff:
LUCIO ORTIZ-CONTRERAS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PARKS v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., HARRELL WATTS, J. L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. HILL, II
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., HARRELL WATTS, J. L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
