Cases 1 - 10 of 11
FOURTE v. SPENCER
as 1:2018cv02023
Respondent:
RICHARD V. SPENCER
Petitioner:
MICHAEL W.C. FOURTE and MICHAEL FOURTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRASURE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2014cv01385
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EDMUND JERRY BROWN and KAMALA HARRIS
Plaintiff:
SPENCER R. BRASURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Spencer v. USA
as 11-5243
Petitioner - Appellant:
David R. Spencer
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
ROLLIER-SPENCER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv00780
Petitioner:
SUZANNE DENISE SPENCER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPENCER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00734
Petitioner:
ROLLIN LEE SPENCER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and YAZOO COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SPENCER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv01871
Petitioner:
DAVID R. SPENCER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Theodore Shove, et al v. US District Court Judges, et al
as 10-5175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Theodore Shove
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Richard J. Vieira, Paul C. Bolin, Spencer Brasure and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States District Court Judges, In and for California, Audrey Collins, Central District Chief Judge, Manual Real and others
SPENCER v. FENTY et al
as 1:2010cv00771
Plaintiff:
EMMETT E. SPENCER
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY, DEVON BROWN, SIMON WAINWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOVE et al v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES et al
as 1:2009cv02316
Plaintiff:
THEODORE SHOVE, RICHARD J. VIEIRA, PAUL C. BOLIN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, AUDREY COLLINS, MANUAL REAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
