Cases 91 - 100 of 101
ENNIS v. LOTT et al
as 1:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
QUENTA ENNIS
Defendant:
BOBBY LOTT, RICK BERRY and D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEARD v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL NETWORK et al
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
RICK BEARD
Defendant:
HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL NETWORK, SIDNEY THOMPSON, JP MORGAN CHASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MINNFEE v. PERRY et al
as 1:2007cv02194
Petitioner:
BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE
Respondent:
RICK PERRY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. GEREN et al
as 1:2007cv02041
Plaintiff:
ROLAND JONES
Defendant:
PETE GEREN, ARMY REVIEW BOARDS AGENCY, G. E. VANDERBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
HILL v. VEACH et al
as 1:2007cv01137
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH and KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. VEACH
as 1:2007cv00886
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. VEACH
as 1:2007cv00518
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUBBARD v. STATE OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2007cv00212
Petitioner:
GEORGE D. HUBBARD
Respondent:
STATE OF MISSOURI, YVONNE KAY WIPPEL and RICK FETTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
