Cases 91 - 100 of 291
FERGUSON v. STATE OF LOUISIANA
as 1:2017cv01654
Petitioner:
TERRY MATTHEW FERGUSON
Respondent:
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
TERRY et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2017cv01585
Plaintiff:
KENT TERRY and DAVID CODREA
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MCGREGOR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv01518
Plaintiff:
TERRY MCGREGOR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
USA v. Terry Albright
as 17-3029
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Terry Albright
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-7062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PARSHALL v. WGL HOLDINGS, INC., et al
as 1:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARSHALL
Defendant:
WGL HOLDINGS, INC., MICHAEL D. BARNES, GEORGE P. CLANCY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
JACKSON v. WGL HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00530
Plaintiff:
LISA JACKSON
Defendant:
WGL HOLDINGS INC. , MICHAEL D. BARNES , GEORGE P. CLANCY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
