Cases 11 - 20 of 2,501
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01273
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael Baxley v. Christine Wormuth, et al
as 24-5104
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Baxley
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, Honorable, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army and Army Board for Correction of Military Records
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DANTZLER v. JORDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER and OSCAR C. DANTZLER
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILL JORDEN, DOUGLAS WELBORN, ALVIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
