Cases 11 - 20 of 27
AZUBUKO v. ONE UNKNOWN BOSTON POLICE OFFICER et al
as 1:2020cv03525
Defendant:
ONE UNKNOWN BOSTON POLICE OFFICER, TWO UNKNOWN BROOKLINE POLICE OFFICERS, CLERK and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Douglas Woodlock, et al
as 20-5321
Defendant / Appellee:
Rod J. Rosenstein, In Individual and Official Capacities, Jennifer Beckwith, In Individual and Official Capacities, Andrew E. Lelling, In Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Richard Story, et al
as 20-5279
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis Saylor, IV, In Individual and Official Capacities and Richard W. Story, In Individual and Official Capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
AZUBUKO et al v. HARTZ et al
as 1:2020cv00396
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL TYMLOVICH, ROBIN J. CAURON, DAVID M. EBEL and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO and PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
AZUBUKO v. STORY et al
as 1:2019cv03855
Defendant:
DENIS SAYLOR, IV and RICHARD W. STORY
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AZUBUKO v. STORY et al
as 1:2019cv03856
Defendant:
RICHARD G. STEARNS, JENNIFER BECKWITH, DOUGLAS PRESETON WOODLOCK and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
AZUBUKO v. KRUPP et al
as 1:2019cv02764
Defendant:
PETER B. KRUPP and KATHLEEN MCCARTHY-NEYMAN
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZUBUKO v. BURDMAN et al
as 1:2019cv02550
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS' SUFFOLK SUPERIOR COURT, ALL JURORS TO THE CASE, PAULA M. CAREY and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
