Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5044
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2009cv00362
Plaintiff:
ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON, FRANK M. TORTI and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Baystate Medical Center v. Charles E. Johnson, et al
as 09-5039
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Baystate Medical Center
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles E. Johnson, Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC. v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC. and EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HOPE CARE, INC. v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
HOPE CARE, INC. and HOPE CARE, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PROVIDENCE ST. PETER HOSPITAL v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE ST. PETER HOSPITAL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC. v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC. and EAGLE HEALTHCARE, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00186
Plaintiff:
PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NORTHEAST HOSPITAL CORPORATION v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
NORTHEAST HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS v. JOHNSON
as 1:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2345 Medicare Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
