Cases 11 - 20 of 75
MITCHELL v. SAMUELS
as 1:2016cv00756
Plaintiff:
WALLACE G. MITCHELL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAZEL v. SAMUELS
as 1:2016cv00543
Petitioner:
BOBBY E. HAZEL
Respondent:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEVINE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al
as 1:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. LEVINE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and NEWTON KENDIG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MALLOY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Petitioner:
GERALD J. MALLOY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016mc00273
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., JOE NORWOOD, J. HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
GORDON v. SAMUELS
as 1:2016cv00037
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Respondent:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2015cv01814
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. RIPPLE et al
as 1:2015cv01709
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN RIPPLE, INTAKE COUNSEL, SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01360
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., J. HOLLINGSWORTH, REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv01285
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
