Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
MUHAMMAD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01079
Plaintiff: RAHEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, PATRICK R. DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DONAHUE v. FIG & OLIVE DC LLC
as 1:2015cv01549
Plaintiff: LAURA DONAHUE
Defendant: FIG & OLIVE DC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARPENTERS LABOR-MANAGEMENT PENSION FUND et al v. FRIEDMAN TRUST
as 1:2014cv01873
Plaintiff: RICHARD TRAVIS, DENNIS DONAHUE, CARPENTERS LABOR-MANAGEMENT PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: GOLFING PARTNERS, LLC, DOES 1 THROUGH 10, DAVID FRIEDMAN TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01110
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01251
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TAITZ v. DONAHUE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01020
Plaintiff: ORLY TAITZ
Defendant: PATRICK DONAHUE and DAVID C. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Lawrence Farrell, et al v. USA
as 12-5164
Plaintiff - Appellant: Lawrence M. Farrell
Plaintiff - Appellee: Dennis J. Donahue, Jr. and Rosalea V. Donahue
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5100
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5098
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
HARRIS v. DONAHUE, et al.,
as 1:2011cv02030
Plaintiff: ARETHA HARRIS
Defendant: DOUG FERRELL and PATRICK R. DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?