Cases 11 - 20 of 35
PITTMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
CARMEN PITTMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
YELDER v. HAGEL et al
as 1:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
GLORIA YELDER
Defendant:
CHUCK HAGEL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ROBERT MINCHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGLAS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
RAYSHAWN DOUGLAS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, LESLIE BILBRUE, ALICIA PULLIAM ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kareemah Bell-Boston v. Janelle Pittman
as 12-7121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kareemah Bell-Boston
Defendant - Appellee:
Janelle Pittman, Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library
BELL-BOSTON v. PITTMAN
as 1:2012cv01857
Plaintiff:
KAREEMAH BELL-BOSTON
Defendant:
JANELLE PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacqueline Robinson-Reeder v. Christine Kearns, et al
as 11-5356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacqueline T. Robinson-Reeder
Defendant - Appellee:
Christine N. Kearns, Partner, Pillsbury Shaw Pittman Law Firm, John D. Bates, U.S. District Court, David B. Sentelle, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court of Appeal and others
ROGERS v. PITTMAN
as 1:2011cv01368
Plaintiff:
ALFORD ROGERS
Defendant:
ARTHUR PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAMBRELL et al v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv00626
Plaintiff:
JAMES GAMBRELL , KENNETH C. EASTON , TALIB M. SHAKIR and others
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. , CRANSTON J. MITCHELL , PATRICA K. CUSHWA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00051
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 8001
Ziad Akl v. Brian Holeman, et al
as 10-7072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ziad Akl, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Holeman, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, Patrick J. Potter and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
