Cases 11 - 16 of 16
SENKO et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 1:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SENKO , PATRICIA SENKO , ROBERT RALPH ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639-EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST FUND et al v. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01424
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639-EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST FUND , JOHN GIBSON , PHILIP GILES and others
Defendant:
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC , DAVID A. RUSSO and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
David Keating, et al v. FEC
as 09-5342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Speechnow.org, David Keating, Fred M. Young, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
FRC Action, Alliance for Justice, Mackinac Center for Public Policy and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Democracy 21 and Campaign Legal Center
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Richard Briffault
Speechnow.org v. FEC
as 08-5223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Speechnow.org, David Keating, Fred M. Young, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Democracy 21, Campaign Legal Center, Campaign Legal Center and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
FRC Action, Alliance for Justice, Mackinac Center for Public Policy and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Richard Briffault
SPEECHNOW.ORG et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2008cv00248
Plaintiff:
SPEECHNOW.ORG, DAVID KEATING, FRED M. YOUNG, JR. and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Series 7 Broker Qualification
as 07-7162
:
In re: Series 7 Broker Qualification Exam Scoring Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Lowe, Timothy Wallin, Linda Cutler and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and EDS Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
