Cases 11 - 20 of 138
Crowley Government Services, Inc. v. GSA, et al
as 23-5214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Crowley Government Services, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
General Services Administration and Robin Carnahan, in her official capacity as Administrator of the General Services Administration
SHARMA v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv02603
Plaintiff:
MEHUL SHARMA
Defendant:
LLOYD AUSTIN, MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ, ROBIN ASHTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBIN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02393
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MARK ROBIN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN and RENA BITTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Crowley Government Services, Inc. v. GSA, et al
as 23-5183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Crowley Government Services, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
General Services Administration and Robin Carnahan, in her official capacity as Administrator of the General Services Administration
MONBO et al v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 1:2023cv02369
Plaintiff:
DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant:
ROBIN S. SCHWARTZ and MONICA A. O'CONNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abdul Mohammed v. Christopher Cooper, et al
as 23-5167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher R. Cooper, Beryl A. Howell, James E. Boasberg and others
MOHAMMED v. COOPER et al
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COOPER, BERYL A. HOWELL, JAMES BOASBERG and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
SUBER v. SUBER
as 1:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
ROBIN LOLANDA SUBER
Defendant:
ANDRE RICARDO SUBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Intellistop Inc. v. DOT, et al
as 22-1260
Petitioner:
Intellistop Inc.
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
