Cases 11 - 20 of 34
ATCHLEY et al v. ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED et al
as 1:2017cv02136
Plaintiff:
AMY RITCHIE, BRENDA CHAND, JEAN DAMMANN and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, ETHICON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
TATE v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00851
Plaintiff:
BETTYE A. TATE
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC , SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. and BWW LAW GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TATE v. SAFEWAY INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00843
Plaintiff:
TONYA D. GREGORY TATE
Defendant:
SAFEWAY INC. and ULTRA-CARE FLOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TATE v. NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION LOCAL 305 et al
as 1:2016cv02021
Plaintiff:
CHRIS TATE
Defendant:
NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION LOCAL 305 and FELANDRIA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
TATE-BECKWITH v. TWENTY-EIGHT, INC.
as 1:2016cv01974
Plaintiff:
ESTELLA TATE-BECKWITH
Defendant:
TWENTY-EIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. TATE COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01973
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , WILLIAM DEMPSEY , RODERICK S. BASHIR and others
Defendant:
TATE COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC., WILLIAM BYLES, FRANCINE TATE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ANDREW v. HERRING et al
as 1:2016cv01775
Defendant:
MARK HERRING , LARRY T. BAILEY , ROY E. BOSWELL and others
Plaintiff:
COLIN ANDREW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
