Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,513
USA v. Shelton Marbury
as 24-3100
Defendant: Shelton Marbury, also known as Wah-Luck
Plaintiff: United States of America
Phillips 66 Company v. FERC, et al
as 24-1263
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Petitioner: Phillips 66 Company
TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. FERC, et al
as 24-1268
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Petitioner: TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR THEFT OF COMPUTER DATA INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml01630
Unknown: APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR THEFT OF COMPUTER DATA INVESTIGATION
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Request for Judicial Assistance
USA v. Calvin Smith
as 24-3098
Defendant: Calvin Smith, also known as A-Say
Plaintiff: United States of America
Tyrone Hurt v. USA
as 24-8006
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hurt
Defendant: United States of America
U.S.A. v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, et. al.
as 1:2024cv02226
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
COPELAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Defendant: DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL doing business as DAVID A. HUBERT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL doing business as MERRICK GARLAND and others
Plaintiff: DONALD RUSSELL COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Tyrone Hurt v. USA
as 24-8004
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hurt
Defendant: United States of America, et al
Maryland Transit Administration v. STB, et al
as 24-1257
Petitioner: Maryland Transit Administration
Respondent: United States of America and Surface Transportation Board

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?