Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ALAMOUDI v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01877
Plaintiff:
ABDURAHAM MUHAMMAD ALAMOUDI
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, THOMAS R. KANE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Karen Ripple, et al
as 16-5097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen Ripple, Fed. Probation Ofc., Intake Counsel, D.C. Bar Assn., Supervisor, Fed. Probation Office and others
KUBAN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv00510
Petitioner:
KENNETH KUBAN
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and THOMAS R. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARROCA v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2013cv01286
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARROCA
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., THOMAS R. KANE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. KANE
as 1:2012cv01212
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. NEAL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lent Carr, II v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 12-5048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lent C. Carr, II
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, United States of America, United States Department of Justice and others
LEE v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
LENT C. CARR, II
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
