Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MCNAIR v. CVS PHARMACY et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MCNAIR
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, DEQAUN ADAMS, CVS PHARMACY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APOLLO, SR. v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01775
Plaintiff:
JOSE G. APOLLO, SR.
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC. and ALI ABDULKAREEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
RICHARDSON et al v. AZKO NOBEL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02112
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, CHINOOK GLOBAL LIMITED, EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, KIRK CHAFFEE, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
MADDEN et al v. CVS/CAREMARK CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv01221
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MADDEN and P & M PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant:
CVS/CAREMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIFFENDERFER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv01338
Plaintiff:
REGINALD L. DIFFENDERFER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VERNE BETLACH and CUSTOM RX COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
In Re: LORAZEPAM/CLORAZE, et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, et al
as 1:1999mc00276
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION , STATE OF FLORIDA , STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. , CAMBREX CORPORATION , PROFARMACO S.R.L. and others
Movant:
AETNA US HEALTHCARE , CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STEVEN ARONSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
