Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
DATA INTEGRATORS, INC. et al v. U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE et al
as 1:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
DATA INTEGRATORS, INC. , ROBERT DENTON and ANDREW JESSOP
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE, DAVITA VANCE-COOKS and JIM BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BAKER v. SPATH et al
as 1:2017cv02311
Petitioner:
JOHN G. BAKER
Respondent:
VANCE SPATH and JAMES MATTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILLIAMS v. BRENNAN et al
as 1:2017cv01285
Plaintiff:
PAULETTE A. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, LISA MURRAY, ALICIA K. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Derrick Williams v. DOJ, et al
as 16-5273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick L. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Loretta E. Lynch, John Walsh, U.S. Attorney of Colorado and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILLIAMS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00679
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LORETTA E. LYNCH, JOHN WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC, et al v. FCC, et al
as 14-1235
Petitioner:
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC, Medical West Ballas Pharmacy, Ltd., Goodland Foods, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Richie Enterprises, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
