Cases 21 - 30 of 2,841
JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
as 1:2024mc00006
Plaintiff:
JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC., JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
USA v. Jonathan Johnson
as 24-3003
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Johnson, also known as Johnathan Johnson
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VARGO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VARGO
Defendant:
BRYANT WILLIAMS and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WHITE v. BAGSHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA CHARITY WHITE
Defendant:
JASON BAGSHAW, NEIL MCALLISTER and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
HOUSMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
as 1:2023cv03814
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOUSMAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JJCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Trayveon Johnson
as 23-3229
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Trayveon James Johnson, also known as Treyueon James Johnson, also known as Treyski
ADAMKAVICIUS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ADAMKAVICIUS, JOYCE MEHRER, KEVIN MEHRER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
