Cases 21 - 30 of 40
HEYER v. SCHWARTZ & ASSOCIATES PLLC et al
as 1:2016cv00836
Plaintiff:
ERIC N. HEYER
Defendant:
SCHWARTZ & ASSOCIATES PLLC and CHRISTOPHER SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Araya Henok v. Wendy Schwartz, et al
as 15-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Araya Henok
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Schwartz and Wendy H. Schwartz and Associates, PLLC
COBB v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. COBB
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, METRO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERCHANTS MORTGAGE COMPANY v. SCHWARTZ, et al
as 1:1967cv00390
Plaintiff:
MERCHANTS MORTGAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
REUBEN SCHWARTZ and BEULAH SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HENOK v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 1:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
ARAYA HENOK
Defendant:
WENDY SCHWARTZ and WENDY H. SCHWARTZ AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENOK v. WENDY H. SCHWARTZ AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC et al
as 1:2013cv01619
Plaintiff:
ARAYA HENOK
Defendant:
WENDY H. SCHWARTZ AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC and WENDY SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
K. S. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2013cv00445
Plaintiff:
K. S. , LOUIS SCHWARTZ and MARILYN SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
SCHWARTZ PARTNERS PACKAGING, LLC v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
SCHWARTZ PARTNERS PACKAGING LLC
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and LAFE SOLOMON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Donald Cobb v. Vincent Gray, et al
as 12-7067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald L. Cobb
Defendant - Appellee:
Vincent C. Gray, Jim Graham, Jack Evans and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
