Cases 21 - 30 of 30
GRANT v. ARCURE et al
as 1:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
TERRY LENNETTE GRANT
Defendant:
MARVIN H. DUKES, III, MAGALIE A. ARCURE, ANDREW M. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SILVA v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
PAUL SILVA
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SILVA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2013cv00764
Plaintiff:
MARIA SILVA
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
JEWLER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01843
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JEWLER , BRENNAN MCFARLANE, JR. , ANTONYA HUNTENBERG and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CATHY LANIER, IRVIN NATHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SILVA AND SONS DISTRIBUTING, INC. v. BIG WAY, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01981
Plaintiff:
SILVA AND SONS DISTRIBUTING, INC.
Defendant:
BIG WAY, INC. and HONG WOO NAM
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
USA v. Nancy Rubio
as 10-3059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Nancy Conde Rubio, also known as Doris Adriana, also known as Alexandra Rubio Silva, also known as La Tia, also known as Luz Dary, also known as Maritza, also known as La Senora, also known as La Mona
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
FIESTA DC INC v. GRIFFITHS et al
as 1:2007cv00722
Plaintiff:
FIESTA DC INC
Defendant:
ARTURO GRIFFITHS, WILLIANS SILVA, TILA BERROCAL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
