Cases 21 - 28 of 28
SANCHEZ PEREZ v. J. C. ENTERPRISES, INC.
as 1:2015cv00526
Plaintiff:
LEONIDAS SANCHEZ PEREZ
Defendant:
J. C. ENTERPRISES, INC. , HD ENTERPRISE, INC. and XIAO DONG BIAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
IN RE: CERTAIN TIRES AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
as 1:2014mc00054
Petitioner:
TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD, TOYO TIRE HOLDINGS OF AMERICAS INC., TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP. and others
Respondent:
SVIZZ-ONE CORPORATION LTD. , HONG KONG TRI-ACE TIRE CO., LTD., WEIFANG SHUNFUCHANG RUBBER & PLASTIC CO., LTD. and others
LIN v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01039
Plaintiff:
DA DONG LIN
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hwang, Geum Joo, et al v. Japan
as 01-7169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Geum Joo Hwang, Yuan Zhulin, Lola Tomasa Salinog and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Japan, Minister Yohei Kono, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Washington Coalition for Comfort Women Issues, Inc., New York Coalition on Comfort Women Issues, Kelly Askin, Professor and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
United States of America
JOHNSON v. JOO, et al
as 1:2001cv00004
Plaintiff:
PAMELA JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONG MOON JOO, WASHINGTON TIMES CORPORATION and NEWS WORLD COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Petitioner:
HOLY SPIRIT ASSOCIATION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF WORLD CHRISTIANITY, UNIFICATION CHURCH INTERNATIONAL, INC., JAMES BORER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dong, Margaret v. Smithsonian Inst
as 96-5303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Margaret Dong
Defendant - Appellant:
Smithsonian Institution, Hirshhorn Museum & Sculpture Garden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
