Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, THOMAS E. PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Association of American Railro v. DOT, et al
as 15-1415
Petitioner:
Association of American Railroads
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Anthony Foxx, Secretary of Transportation and others
Interstate Natural Gas Associa v. DOT, et al
as 15-1343
Petitioner:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Anthony Foxx and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scenic Hudson v. DOT, et al
as 15-1195
Petitioner:
Scenic Hudson
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation and Anthony Foxx, Secretary of Transportation
Interstate Natural Gas Assoc. v. DOT, et al
as 15-1161
Petitioner:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Anthony Foxx, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00658
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00644
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
