Cases 21 - 30 of 116
QUARTEY v. CLINTON
as 1:2015cv01510
Plaintiff:
MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
QUARTEY v. CLINTON
as 1:2015cv01100
Plaintiff:
MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
QUARTEY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
MARY AKU QUARTEY
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. BUSH et al
as 1:2015cv00778
Plaintiff:
AUDREY TAYLOR CARTER
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dale Adams v. Department of State, et al
as 13-5244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale B. Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of State, Condoleezza Rice, Former United States Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton, United States Secretary of State and others
FLORES v. GUADAMUD et al
as 1:2013cv00688
Plaintiff:
XAVIER FLORES
Defendant:
MARIANA GUADAMUD, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TEICH v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2013cv00017
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE CONTRACT REVIEW PANEL and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY Z. TEICH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
JENKINS v. CLINTON, et al.
as 1:2012mc00665
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY JENKINS
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., LUCY CHERNOW BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
