Cases 21 - 30 of 62
CALDERON LOPEZ v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv01451
Defendant:
JEFFREY ADKINS, LISA NESBITT, HOPE SWANN and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ and RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ doing business as STARLIGHT CONSULTING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRABTREE v. CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2018cv01068
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. CRABTREE
Defendant:
CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
WASHINGTON v. HOPE FOUND INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01038
Plaintiff:
MADELINE L. WASHINGTON
Defendant:
HOPE FOUND INC. and EMMANUEL KHUMBAH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LEE-THOMAS v. LABCORP, LABORATORY CORP. OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00591
Defendant:
LAB CORP
Plaintiff:
HOPE LEE-THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
FOSTER v. QUICK-LIVICK, INCORPORATED
as 1:2017cv00830
Plaintiff:
HOPE S. FOSTER
Defendant:
QUICK-LIVICK, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. COMMUNITY OF HOPE
as 1:2016cv00921
Defendant:
COMMUNITY OF HOPE
Plaintiff:
CECELIA LANE
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ABDUS-SABUR v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
JASON ABDUS-SABUR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA , HOPE VILLAGE, INC. and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , HOPE VILLAGE, INC. , SHEILA ADEGBIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
