Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 46
League of Women Voters, et al v. Brian Newby, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5196
Plaintiff - Appellant: League of Women Voters of the United States, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Georgia and others
Defendant - Appellee: Brian D. Newby, in his capacity as the Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and United States Election Assistance Commission
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Kris W. Kobach, Kansas Secretary of State and Public Interest Legal Foundation
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2016cv00995
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Defendant: U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. NEWBY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00236
Plaintiff: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES , LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ALABAMA , LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant: BRIAN D. NEWBY and UNITED STATES ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Intervenor_defendant: KRIS W. KOBACH and PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Amicu: LANDMARK LEGAL FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2015cv01651
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Defendant: U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2014cv00895
Defendant: THOMAS J. VILSACK , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE , ALFRED V. ALMANZA and others
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST et al v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00375
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST and MERCURY POLICY PROJECT
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and MARGARET A. HAMBURG
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0348
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Featured Case
as 1:2011cv00288
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
David Keating, et al v. FEC
as 09-5342
Plaintiff - Appellant: Speechnow.org, David Keating, Fred M. Young, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee: Federal Election Commission
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: FRC Action, Alliance for Justice, Mackinac Center for Public Policy and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Democracy 21 and Campaign Legal Center
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and Richard Briffault
CHEMICAL WEAPONS WORKING GROUP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv00645
Plaintiff: CHEMICAL WEAPONS WORKING GROUP , FAMILIES CONCERNED ABOUT NERVE GAS INCINERATION , CALHOUN COUNTY CHAPTER OF THE SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and UNITED STATES ARMY
Movant: EG & G DEFENSE MATERIALS, INC. and STATE OF OREGON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Public Citizen v. FMCSA
as 09-1094
Petitioner: Public Citizen, Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, Truck Safety Coalition and others
Respondent: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Intervenor For Petitioner: William B. Trescott
Intervenor For Respondent: American Trucking Associations, Inc., Health & Personal Care Logistics Conference, Inc., NASSTRAC, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: Center for Science in the Public Interest, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, OMB Watch and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?