Cases 21 - 30 of 477
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03512
Plaintiff:
LYNN GISELE KING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KING v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
LAKISHA KING
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant:
1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Anthony Braxton v. Marnitta King
as 23-7098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
Marnitta L. King
ESTATE OF WANDA LORRAINE KELLY JOHNSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01689
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WANDA LORRAINE KELLY JOHNSON, ARI SIMONE FOSTER, ESTATE OF ETHELEAN KING KELLY and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HO v. RADIO FREE ASIA et al
as 1:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
KING MAN HO
Defendant:
RADIO FREE ASIA, MIN MITCHELL and NADIA TSAO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
BRAXTON v. KING
as 1:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
MARNITTA KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
