Cases 21 - 30 of 52
STILL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2017cv01420
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE STILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
BALFOUR v. HERMAN
as 1:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
RHONDA GRANT BALFOUR
Defendant:
KELLY SUZANNE HERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
ROGERS v. WINTER
as 1:2016cv00954
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ROGERS
Defendant:
SUZANNE WINTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MAZE et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2015cv01806
Plaintiff:
EVA MAZE , SUZANNE BATRA and MARGOT LICHTENSTEIN
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BOVA et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. BOVA , RICHIE BAKER , CORA FRYE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
INTERNATIONAL EXPORTS, INC. et al v. HAGEL et al
as 1:2014cv02064
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL EXPORTS, INC. , SUZANNE ITANI and ZIAD ITANI
Defendant:
CHUCK HAGEL, DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY, MARK D. HARNITCHEK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. v. MILLER et al
as 1:2014cv00749
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
SUZANNE M. MILLER and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
BROWN v. HILL et al
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BROWN
Defendant:
SANDRA HILL, RANDY RAYBON, SUZANNE BOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
