Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,116
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff: ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant: ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant: KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01289
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01287
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01273
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lokesh Vuyyuru v. Y.S. Reddy, et al
as 24-7066
Plaintiff: Lokesh B. Vuyyuru, M.D.
Defendant: Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Gowtham Adani, Klaus Schwab and others
WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff: WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION d/b/a MedStar Washington Hospital Center and MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005 Review of Agency Action-HHS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5115
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
SWARTZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01228
Plaintiff: ROGER SWARTZ
Defendant: JOE BIDEN, AMY GUTMANN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?