Cases 31 - 40 of 2,279
JERNIGAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01666
Defendant:
SUSAN BURNS, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER and others
Plaintiff:
LARIS BRITTON JERNIGAN, XUAN THI TRAN and NHAN QUANG BAO TRAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
TAYLOR v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and TARIQUE ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
CHARMAIN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 01DCC2439 WMATA (court jurisdiction)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01582
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01583
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
AL NAQEEB v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01524
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, DAVID BURGER, RENA BITTER and others
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED KADHIM AL NAQEEB
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
AHMED v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
AHMED MOHAMED SALEM M AHMED
Defendant:
EVYENIA SIDEREAS, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WILGUS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
JAMES VINCENT WILGUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
