Cases 31 - 35 of 35
Mt Royal Joint Vntr, et al v. Kempthorne, Dirk, et al
as 05-5379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mount Royal Joint Venture, Pete Woods and Maxine Woods
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior and P. Lynn Scarlett, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior
Defendant - Appellee:
Sylvia V. Baca, Acting Assistant Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, Tom Fry, Director, Bureau of Land Management and others
Amer Fed Govt Empl, et al v. USA, et al
as 02-5142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 2263, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 153 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and James G. Roche, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Chugach Management Services Joint Venture and Chugach Management Services, Inc.
21st Centry Telesis, et al v. FCC
as 01-1435
Appellant - Appellant:
21st Century Telesis Joint Venture and 21st Century Bidding Corporation
Appellee - Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor:
Salmon PCS, LLC
Kiska Const Corp, et al v. WMATA
as 01-7156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kiska Construction Corporation, U.S.A., A Partner in KISKA-KAJIMA, A Joint Venture and Kajima Engineering and Construction, Incorporated, A Partner in KISKA-KAJIMA, A Joint Venture
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Mergentime Corp, et al v. WMATA ., et al
as 97-7138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mergentime Corporation, a partner in MERGENTIME/PERINI JOINT VENTURE
Plaintiff:
Perini Corporation, a Partner in MERGENTIME/PERINI JOINT VENTURE
Defendant:
John F. McElhenny, in his official capacity as Contracting Officer, WMATA
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Insurance Company of North America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
