Cases 31 - 40 of 363
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. REGAN et al
as 1:2023cv02767
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Kinder Morgan, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 23-1181
Petitioner:
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Intervenor:
State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
Massachusetts Electric Company, et al v. FERC
as 23-1169
Petitioner:
Massachusetts Electric Company, doing business as National Grid, Nantucket Electric Company, doing business as National Grid and New England Power Company, doing business as National Grid
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC. v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, JANET COIT and others
Intervenor Defendant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of California, et al v. EPA
as 23-1020
Petitioner:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
ARDANEH v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
HAMID REZA ARDANEH
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, KRISTEN BUXTON, CEARA MAHONEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maine Lobstermen's Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maine Lobstermen's Association
Not Yet Classified:
State of Maine Department of Marine Resources, District 4 Lodge of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 207 and Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Intervenor / Appellee:
Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire and Maine State Chamber of Commerce
Maine Lobstermen's Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5244
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maine Lobstermen's Association
Not Yet Classified:
State of Maine Department of Marine Resources, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association and District 4 Lodge of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 207
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Intervenor / Appellee:
Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire and Maine State Chamber of Commerce
Maine Lobstermen's Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5245
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maine Lobstermen's Association
Not Yet Classified:
State of Maine Department of Marine Resources, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association and District 4 Lodge of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 207
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Intervenor / Appellee:
Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire and Maine State Chamber of Commerce
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
