Cases 31 - 40 of 654
Benjamin Woodhouse v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 23-5188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benjamin Woodhouse, Mr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Meta Platforms Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike Inc. and others
IMC AMERICAS, INC. et al v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv02668
Plaintiff:
IMC AMERICAS, INC. and GAURAV KUMAR
Not Classified By Court:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR JADDOU and LOREN K. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KALIL v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv02657
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. KALIL
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TROY A. MILLER and DAVID P. PEKOSKE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LAURENT MILLER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02349
Plaintiff:
HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BOARD OF VETERANS APPEALS and NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
WOODHOUSE v. META PLATFORMS INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01924
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS INC., ALPHABET INC., NIKE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
M. A. et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
M. A., R. S., M. P. and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UR JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
MILLER-EVANS v. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MILLER-EVANS
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and BRYAN KASUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
