Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
William Havens v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.
as 12-5339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Havens
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy; Chairman, Board for Corrections of Naval Records
Victor Brown v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.
as 12-5301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Ivy Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Hon., Secretary of the Navy
VINCE v. MABUS
as 1:2012cv01465
Plaintiff:
LOUIS VINCE
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MAGNESON v. MABUS
as 1:2012cv01053
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL A. MAGNESON
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson McGrady v. Dept. of Navy, et al
as 12-5195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jackson L. McGrady, Major, United States Marine Corps
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Navy and Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy
ABOU-HUSSEIN v. MABUS et al
as 1:2012cv00913
Plaintiff:
HAMDY ALEX ABOU-HUSSEIN
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR. and NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Becky Roberts v. USA, et al
as 12-5149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Becky Roberts
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy and Chairman of the Board For Correction of Naval Records
Jonathan Bourdon, et al v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 12-5066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Thomas Bourdon and Jeffrey G. Walls
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Honorable, Secretary of the Navy, O Tom Crane, HR Specialist for NDW, Harris Cummings, Cheif Investigator for NDW and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
