Cases 31 - 40 of 42
LOVE-EL v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01678
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO LOVE-EL
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, STEPHEN T. NASKO, STEVEN HUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00895
Defendant:
TAMIO SAITO, E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GEORGE SOBOL and others
Interested Party:
MICHAEL GARDINER, RICHARD BARRETT, WAYNE DRIZIN and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMART FOREST VENTURES I, L.P.
as 1:2010mc00127
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SMART FOREST VENTURES I, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Appointment of Receiver
GREEN GRID ASSOCIATION v. SMART GREEN GRID INITIATIVE et al
as 1:2009cv02279
Plaintiff:
GREEN GRID ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
SMART GREEN GRID INITIATIVE and DAN DELUREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
David Kissi v. David Panzer, et al
as 09-7126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Kissi
Defendant - Appellee:
David Panzer, EMC/Bear Stearns/JP Morgan, Williams Ampofo and others
HUDSON v. SMART
as 1:2009cv01660
Plaintiff:
CHERYL D. LOTT HUDSON
Defendant:
RONALD SMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HUDSON v. SMART
as 1:2009cv01562
Plaintiff:
CHERYL D. LOTT HUDSON
Defendant:
PATSY BUTLER SMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HUDSON v. SMART
as 1:2009cv01561
Plaintiff:
CHERYL D. LOTT HUDSON
Defendant:
ASHLEIGH SMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
David M. Kissi v. David Panzer, et al
as 09-7009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Kissi
Defendant - Appellee:
David Samuel Panzer, EMC/Bear Stearns/JP Morgan, Williams Ampofo and others
KISSI v. PANZER et al
as 1:2008cv01870
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
DAVID PANZER, EMC/BEAR STEARNS/JP MORGAN, WILLIAMS AMPOFO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
